44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTA vs MDLZ
FSTA vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts FSTA vs MDLZ
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
Price$51.07
Change-$0.58 (-1.12%)
Volume$117.28K
Net Assets1.35B
Mondelez International
Price$66.93
Change-$1.19 (-1.75%)
Volume$6.53M
Capitalization94.25B
FSTA vs MDLZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTA vs. MDLZ commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTA is a Hold and MDLZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
MDLZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FSTA | MDLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 72% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 38% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FSTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSTA has been closely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSTA jumps, then KO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSTA | 100% | -1.12% | ||
| KO - FSTA | 76% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| PEP - FSTA | 74% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| MDLZ - FSTA | 72% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| PG - FSTA | 71% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| KHC - FSTA | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||
MDLZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | -1.75% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 69% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| HSY - MDLZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
More | ||||