Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSZX vs NAESX
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSSZX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp Z
Price$38.56
Change+$0.32 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSZX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSZX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. FSSZX (5.04B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSSZX: NAESX (1.28) vs FSSZX (0.97). FSSZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSSZX (8 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSSZX (0.76) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSSZX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. FSSZX (1.41). NAESX (66.66) and FSSZX (66.57) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSSZX | NAESX | FSSZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.17 | 447% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.17 | 447% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.074 | 2.781 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.04B | 153B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.28 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.41 | 8.46 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.85 | 34.15 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.57 | 66.66 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement