Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSZX vs NAESX
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSSZX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp Z
Price$43.36
Change+$0.74 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.7B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$124.04
Change+$1.27 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSZX vs. NAESX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSZX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FSSZX (5.7B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSSZX: NAESX (1.21) vs FSSZX (0.84). FSSZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSSZX (9 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSSZX (0.76) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSSZX (0) vs NAESX (3000). FSSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.71 vs. NAESX (-0.86). FSSZX return over 5 years is better than : 49.40 vs. NAESX (40.97).
| FSSZX | NAESX | FSSZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.17 | 447% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.17 | 447% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.435 | 7.092 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.7B | 162B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.21 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.71 | -0.86 | -315% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.31 | 32.07 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.40 | 40.97 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 131.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers