Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSST vs RECS
FSST vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FSST vs RECS
Fidelity Sustainable U.S. Equity ETF
Price$30.01
Change+$0.06 (+0.20%)
Volume$2.48K
Net Assets17.26M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.98
Change+$0.24 (+0.60%)
Volume$662.45K
Net Assets4.1B
FSST vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSST vs. RECS commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSST is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.1B vs. FSST (17.3M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FSST: RECS (15.482) vs FSST (12.138). FSST was incepted earlier than RECS: FSST (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FSST (0.59). FSST has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FSST | RECS | FSST / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 12.138 | 15.482 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 17.3M | 4.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.15 | 393% |
| Turnover | 72.00 | 49.00 | 147% |
| Yield | 0.32 | 0.60 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FSST | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FSST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FSST and UNH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSST and UNH's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSST | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| UNH - FSST | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| AWK - FSST | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
| GILD - FSST | 11% Poorly correlated | +4.21% | ||
| TMHC - FSST | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| MLM - FSST | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||