Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMNX
FSSRX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMNX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$22.35
Change+$0.36 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.85
Change+$0.20 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
FSSRX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.54B vs. WCMNX (44.4M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.29). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSRX (16.31). FSSRX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.37 vs. FSSRX (-2.53). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.74 vs. FSSRX (-17.36).
| FSSRX | WCMNX | FSSRX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.24 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 2.04 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.175 | 7.486 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 44.4M | 5,716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.53 | -1.37 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.00 | 21.03 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.36 | 0.74 | -2,350% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement