Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMNX
FSSRX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMNX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$20.92
Change-$0.59 (-2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.47B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.05
Change-$0.44 (-3.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
FSSRX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. WCMNX (41.9M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.29). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSRX (16.31). FSSRX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.32 vs. WCMNX (-3.16). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 3.45 vs. FSSRX (-16.30).
| FSSRX | WCMNX | FSSRX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.24 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 2.04 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.067 | 6.304 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 41.9M | 5,900% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.32 | -3.16 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.51 | 22.08 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.30 | 3.45 | -472% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement