Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMLX
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$20.92
Change-$0.59 (-2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.47B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. WCMLX (41.9M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.29). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSRX (16.31). FSSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FSSRX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). FSSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.32 vs. WCMLX (-2.98). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.74 vs. FSSRX (-16.30).
| FSSRX | WCMLX | FSSRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.79 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.067 | 6.454 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 41.9M | 5,900% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.32 | -2.98 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.51 | 22.89 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.30 | 4.74 | -344% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers