Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMLX
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$22.35
Change+$0.36 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.54B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.29). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSRX (16.31). FSSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FSSRX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.14 vs. FSSRX (-2.53). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. FSSRX (-17.36).
| FSSRX | WCMLX | FSSRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.79 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.175 | 7.621 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 44.4M | 5,716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.53 | -1.14 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.00 | 21.83 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.36 | 1.99 | -872% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement