Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WWSMX
FSSNX vs WWSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WWSMX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.00
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Ultra
Price$16.86
Change-$0.10 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.66M
FSSNX vs WWSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WWSMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and WWSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. WWSMX (98.7M). WWSMX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: WWSMX (1.43) vs FSSNX (0.80). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WWSMX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WWSMX (5 years). WWSMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WWSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWSMX: FSSNX (0) vs WWSMX (1000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.96 vs. WWSMX (-0.73). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. WWSMX (32.60).
| FSSNX | WWSMX | FSSNX / WWSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.70 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.87 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.175 | 7.843 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 98.7M | 29,686% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.43 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.96 | -0.73 | -406% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.77 | 29.81 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | 32.60 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers