Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.02
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.66B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$13.01
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.79M
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and WMMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. WMMCX (204M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (0.84) vs WMMCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.05 vs. WMMCX (14.83). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 63.75 vs. WMMCX (-29.86).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.273 | 9.696 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.7B | 204M | 13,578% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.05 | 14.83 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.20 | -25.96 | -128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.75 | -29.86 | -214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.63 | -34.21 | -303% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers