Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.34
Change+$0.28 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.6B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$11.58
Change+$0.18 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.78M
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.6B vs. WMMCX (190M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (1.08) vs WMMCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.91 vs. WMMCX (-2.61). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 30.76 vs. WMMCX (-46.70).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.887 | 8.427 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.6B | 190M | 15,053% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.91 | -2.61 | -725% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.31 | -29.75 | -159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.76 | -46.70 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.50 | -34.69 | -477% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement