Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.64
Change-$0.15 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.55
Change-$0.12 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.83M
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and WMMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. WMMCX (199M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (0.90) vs WMMCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). FSSNX (8.73) and WMMCX (8.47) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 51.48 vs. WMMCX (-35.09).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.468 | 5.818 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 199M | 13,015% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 8.47 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.75 | -33.97 | -55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.48 | -35.09 | -147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.72 | -39.20 | -219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers