Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMAX
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$15.88
Change+$0.11 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.11M
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. WMMAX (203M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FSSNX (0.92) vs WMMAX (0.01). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMAX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. WMMAX (-17.28). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. WMMAX (-21.79).
| FSSNX | WMMAX | FSSNX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.204 | 6.649 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 203M | 12,611% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.01 | 7,377% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | -17.28 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | -25.70 | -122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.96 | -21.79 | -280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.15 | -30.22 | -272% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers