Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMAX
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.03
Change+$2.04 (+6.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$14.73
Change-$1.47 (-9.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.17M
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WMMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. WMMAX (192M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FSSNX (1.03) vs WMMAX (0.44). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMAX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. WMMAX (-0.80). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. WMMAX (-43.75).
| FSSNX | WMMAX | FSSNX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.434 | 9.680 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 192M | 15,469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.44 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | -0.80 | -2,320% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.32 | -30.57 | -129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.49 | -43.75 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.89 | -23.38 | -727% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers