Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMCVX
FSSNX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMCVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
FSSNX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMCVX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and WMCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. WMCVX (1.6B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FSSNX (0.92) vs WMCVX (0.06). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMCVX: FSSNX (0) vs WMCVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. WMCVX (-15.39). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. WMCVX (39.61).
| FSSNX | WMCVX | FSSNX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.204 | -1.216 | -181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 1.6B | 1,601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.06 | 1,464% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | -15.39 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 16.41 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.96 | 39.61 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.15 | 55.10 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers