Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGSX
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGSX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.06
Change+$0.24 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.6B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst
Price$20.32
Change+$0.15 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets969.37M
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.6B vs. WHGSX (969M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: FSSNX (1.08) vs WHGSX (0.75). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGSX (100000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.41 vs. WHGSX (-0.26). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 29.81 vs. WHGSX (14.47).
| FSSNX | WHGSX | FSSNX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.111 | 6.387 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.6B | 969M | 2,951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.75 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.41 | -0.26 | -7,886% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.24 | 8.93 | 518% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.81 | 14.47 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.57 | 90.78 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement