Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGSX
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGSX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.74
Change+$0.09 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst
Price$19.63
Change-$0.07 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.32M
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGSX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and WHGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. WHGSX (942M). WHGSX (0.82) and FSSNX (0.80) have matching dividends . FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGSX (100000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. WHGSX (-3.64). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 31.66 vs. WHGSX (16.45).
| FSSNX | WHGSX | FSSNX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.668 | -3.062 | -479% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 942M | 3,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.82 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | -3.64 | -363% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.13 | 9.50 | 528% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.66 | 16.45 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.25 | 59.72 | 201% |