Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGSX
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGSX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.94
Change-$0.85 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst
Price$19.88
Change-$0.27 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets943.35M
FSSNX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. WHGSX (943M). WHGSX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: WHGSX (0.85) vs FSSNX (0.80). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGSX (100000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.32 vs. WHGSX (-11.74). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.37 vs. WHGSX (30.85).
| FSSNX | WHGSX | FSSNX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.561 | -0.494 | -2,341% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 943M | 3,075% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.85 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | -11.74 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.90 | 5.51 | 670% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.37 | 30.85 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.26 | 62.84 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement