Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGCX
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.60
Change+$0.60 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$20.13
Change+$0.31 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.15M
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and WHGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. WHGCX (942M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: FSSNX (0.80) vs WHGCX (0.26). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WHGCX (6 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGCX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.96 vs. WHGCX (-13.10). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. WHGCX (22.46).
| FSSNX | WHGCX | FSSNX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.79 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.93 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.175 | 0.201 | 6,060% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 942M | 3,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.26 | 310% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.96 | -13.10 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.77 | 1.95 | 1,884% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | 22.46 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement