Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGCX
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.82
Change+$0.37 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.66B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$20.88
Change+$0.38 (+1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and WHGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. WHGCX (1.03B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: FSSNX (0.84) vs WHGCX (0.25). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WHGCX (6 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGCX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.86 vs. WHGCX (-0.11). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 62.74 vs. WHGCX (42.75).
| FSSNX | WHGCX | FSSNX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.79 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.93 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.273 | 4.621 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.7B | 1.03B | 2,682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.25 | 341% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | -0.11 | -12,389% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.98 | 19.66 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.74 | 42.75 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement