Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WHGCX
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WHGCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.06
Change+$0.24 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.6B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$19.93
Change+$0.14 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets969.37M
FSSNX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WHGCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WHGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.6B vs. WHGCX (969M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: FSSNX (1.08) vs WHGCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WHGCX (6 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGCX: FSSNX (0) vs WHGCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.41 vs. WHGCX (-1.29). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 29.81 vs. WHGCX (9.14).
| FSSNX | WHGCX | FSSNX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.79 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.93 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.111 | 6.350 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.6B | 969M | 2,951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.41 | -1.29 | -1,585% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.24 | 5.78 | 800% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.81 | 9.14 | 326% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement