Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs TQSMX
FSSNX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$32.82
Change-$0.04 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.6B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$26.45
Change+$0.08 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
FSSNX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. TQSMX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and TQSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.6B vs. TQSMX (1.1B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSSNX (1.08) vs TQSMX (0.41). FSSNX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSSNX (14 years) vs TQSMX (10 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSSNX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.93 vs. TQSMX (16.07). TQSMX return over 5 years is better than : 46.21 vs. FSSNX (28.01).
| FSSNX | TQSMX | FSSNX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.87 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.240 | 4.877 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.6B | 1.1B | 2,598% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.41 | 262% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.93 | 16.07 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.42 | 44.36 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.01 | 46.21 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers