Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SCUVX
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCUVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$28.13
Change+$0.15 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.33M
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCUVX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and SCUVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. SCUVX (200M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FSSNX (0.92) vs SCUVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs SCUVX (19 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCUVX: FSSNX (0) vs SCUVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. SCUVX (-5.45). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. SCUVX (27.69).
| FSSNX | SCUVX | FSSNX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.35 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.204 | -2.765 | -80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 200M | 12,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | -5.45 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 8.99 | 350% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.96 | 27.69 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.15 | 12.15 | 676% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers