Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SCUVX
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCUVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.13
Change+$0.28 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$28.12
Change+$0.20 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.83M
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCUVX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and SCUVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. SCUVX (202M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FSSNX (0.92) vs SCUVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs SCUVX (19 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCUVX: FSSNX (0) vs SCUVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. SCUVX (0.61). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 64.11 vs. SCUVX (32.14).
| FSSNX | SCUVX | FSSNX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.35 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.626 | -2.800 | -58% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 202M | 12,673% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.15 | 0.61 | 1,998% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.67 | 12.44 | 295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.11 | 32.14 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.87 | 11.22 | 694% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers