Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SCUVX
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCUVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.97
Change-$0.67 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.42B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$28.74
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.51M
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCUVX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and SCUVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. SCUVX (178M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FSSNX (0.82) vs SCUVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs SCUVX (19 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCUVX: FSSNX (0) vs SCUVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.91 vs. SCUVX (-6.03). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 61.23 vs. SCUVX (18.85).
| FSSNX | SCUVX | FSSNX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.35 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.306 | -0.830 | -1,725% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 178M | 15,955% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.91 | -6.03 | -198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.30 | 16.86 | 310% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.23 | 18.85 | 325% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.39 | 17.94 | 632% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement