Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SCUVX
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCUVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$29.87
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.07M
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCUVX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and SCUVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. SCUVX (179M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FSSNX (0.80) vs SCUVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs SCUVX (20 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCUVX: FSSNX (0) vs SCUVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.32 vs. SCUVX (-6.95). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.37 vs. SCUVX (15.64).
| FSSNX | SCUVX | FSSNX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.35 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.561 | 3.249 | 356% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 179M | 16,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | -6.95 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.90 | 13.40 | 275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.37 | 15.64 | 303% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.26 | 24.89 | 447% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement