Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs SCUVX
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs SCUVX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.60
Change+$0.60 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps A
Price$30.32
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.81M
FSSNX vs SCUVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. SCUVX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and SCUVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. SCUVX (181M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than SCUVX: FSSNX (0.80) vs SCUVX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than SCUVX: FSSNX (14 years) vs SCUVX (20 years). SCUVX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). SCUVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCUVX: FSSNX (0) vs SCUVX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.96 vs. SCUVX (-7.64). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. SCUVX (13.75).
| FSSNX | SCUVX | FSSNX / SCUVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.35 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.175 | 4.943 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 181M | 16,188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.96 | -7.64 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.77 | 13.75 | 267% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | 13.75 | 289% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.61 | 23.19 | 455% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers