Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RMCFX
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RMCFX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RMCFX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. RMCFX (291M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: FSSNX (0.92) vs RMCFX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: FSSNX (14 years) vs RMCFX (23 years). RMCFX (1.54) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMCFX: FSSNX (0) vs RMCFX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. RMCFX (-5.79). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. RMCFX (15.33).
| FSSNX | RMCFX | FSSNX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.54 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.204 | 2.693 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 291M | 8,797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | -5.79 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 11.49 | 273% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.96 | 15.33 | 398% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.15 | -15.42 | -533% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers