Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RMCFX
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RMCFX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.74
Change+$0.09 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RMCFX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. RMCFX (312M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: FSSNX (0.80) vs RMCFX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: FSSNX (14 years) vs RMCFX (23 years). RMCFX (1.54) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMCFX: FSSNX (0) vs RMCFX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.91 vs. RMCFX (0.83). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 31.28 vs. RMCFX (-12.75).
| FSSNX | RMCFX | FSSNX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.54 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.342 | 1.021 | 1,404% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 312M | 9,391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.91 | 0.83 | 1,548% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.70 | 15.01 | 331% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.28 | -12.75 | -245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.63 | -1.56 | -7,659% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers