Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RMCFX
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RMCFX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.03
Change+$2.04 (+6.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
FSSNX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RMCFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. RMCFX (336M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: FSSNX (1.03) vs RMCFX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: FSSNX (14 years) vs RMCFX (23 years). RMCFX (1.54) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMCFX: FSSNX (0) vs RMCFX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. RMCFX (11.89). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. RMCFX (-15.29).
| FSSNX | RMCFX | FSSNX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.54 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.434 | 11.466 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 336M | 8,839% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | 11.89 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.32 | 8.21 | 479% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.49 | -15.29 | -167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.89 | 24.22 | 701% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers