Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs RLSMX
FSSNX vs RLSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs RLSMX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.03
Change+$2.04 (+6.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select R6
Price$12.42
Change+$0.94 (+8.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.81M
FSSNX vs RLSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. RLSMX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and RLSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. RLSMX (34.8M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than RLSMX: FSSNX (1.03) vs RLSMX (0.60). FSSNX was incepted earlier than RLSMX: FSSNX (14 years) vs RLSMX (6 years). RLSMX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). RLSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLSMX: FSSNX (0) vs RLSMX (1000000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. RLSMX (0.49). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. RLSMX (-18.35).
| FSSNX | RLSMX | FSSNX / RLSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.434 | 6.154 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 34.8M | 85,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.60 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | 0.49 | 3,800% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.32 | -5.22 | -753% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.49 | -18.35 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement