Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QLSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.94
Change-$0.85 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.34
Change-$0.82 (-2.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QLSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. QLSCX (1.46B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FSSNX (0.80) vs QLSCX (0.32). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.05 vs. FSSNX (5.00). QLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.45 vs. FSSNX (46.94).
| FSSNX | QLSCX | FSSNX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.89 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.236 | 12.453 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 1.46B | 1,982% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.32 | 254% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.00 | 6.05 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.09 | 42.90 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.94 | 50.45 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement