Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QLSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.06
Change+$0.24 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.6B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.91
Change+$0.18 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.6B vs. QLSCX (1.63B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FSSNX (1.08) vs QLSCX (0.32). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QLSCX (10 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.41 vs. QLSCX (12.20). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 29.81 vs. QLSCX (20.56).
| FSSNX | QLSCX | FSSNX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.89 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.111 | 5.280 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.6B | 1.63B | 1,757% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.32 | 336% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.41 | 12.20 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.24 | 43.47 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.81 | 20.56 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement