Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QLSCX
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QLSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.03
Change+$2.04 (+6.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.96
Change-$0.11 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
FSSNX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QLSCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. QLSCX (1.65B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: FSSNX (1.03) vs QLSCX (0.31). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QLSCX (10 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. QLSCX (10.36). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. QLSCX (20.14).
| FSSNX | QLSCX | FSSNX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.88 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.89 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.434 | 5.456 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 1.65B | 1,803% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.31 | 332% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | 10.36 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.32 | 35.35 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.49 | 20.14 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers