Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QCSCX
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QCSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.03
Change+$2.04 (+6.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$22.76
Change-$0.59 (-2.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QCSCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QCSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. QCSCX (1.65B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FSSNX (1.03) vs QCSCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCSCX: FSSNX (0) vs QCSCX (1500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. QCSCX (6.80). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. QCSCX (6.90).
| FSSNX | QCSCX | FSSNX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.00 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.00 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.434 | 5.322 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 1.65B | 1,801% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | 6.80 | 274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.32 | 28.15 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.49 | 6.90 | 369% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.89 | 118.43 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement