Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QCSCX
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QCSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.74
Change+$0.09 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core C
Price$22.07
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
FSSNX vs QCSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QCSCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and QCSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. QCSCX (1.57B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QCSCX: FSSNX (0.80) vs QCSCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QCSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QCSCX (20 years). QCSCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QCSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCSCX: FSSNX (0) vs QCSCX (1500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. QCSCX (3.76). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 31.66 vs. QCSCX (10.63).
| FSSNX | QCSCX | FSSNX / QCSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.00 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.00 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.668 | 5.095 | 288% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 1.57B | 1,867% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | 3.76 | 352% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.13 | 43.03 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.66 | 10.63 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.25 | 79.43 | 151% |