Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs QASCX
FSSNX vs QASCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs QASCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.03
Change+$2.04 (+6.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core A
Price$28.44
Change-$0.18 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
FSSNX vs QASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. QASCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and QASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. QASCX (1.65B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than QASCX: FSSNX (1.03) vs QASCX (0.10). FSSNX was incepted earlier than QASCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs QASCX (20 years). QASCX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). QASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than QASCX: FSSNX (0) vs QASCX (1500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. QASCX (9.63). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. QASCX (17.14).
| FSSNX | QASCX | FSSNX / QASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.14 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.34 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.434 | 5.411 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 1.65B | 1,801% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.10 | 1,014% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | 9.63 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.32 | 33.76 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.49 | 17.14 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.89 | 151.14 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement