Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSCX
FSSNX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.02
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.66B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$22.87
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.68B
FSSNX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSCX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and NMSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. NMSCX (2.68B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSCX (1.39) vs FSSNX (0.84). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). NMSCX (0.20) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSCX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSCX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.05 vs. NMSCX (-3.79). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 63.75 vs. NMSCX (19.34).
| FSSNX | NMSCX | FSSNX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.273 | -0.349 | -2,373% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.7B | 2.68B | 1,034% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.39 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.05 | -3.79 | -423% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.20 | -2.85 | -1,163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.75 | 19.34 | 330% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.63 | 14.73 | 704% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement