Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSCX
FSSNX vs NMSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.57
Change-$0.17 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst
Price$22.12
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5B
FSSNX vs NMSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and NMSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. NMSCX (2.5B). NMSCX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSCX (1.35) vs FSSNX (0.80). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSCX (29 years). NMSCX (0.20) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSCX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSCX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. NMSCX (-5.39). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 31.66 vs. NMSCX (-8.07).
| FSSNX | NMSCX | FSSNX / NMSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.668 | -3.617 | -406% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 2.5B | 1,172% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.35 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | -5.39 | -246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.13 | 1.82 | 2,754% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.66 | -8.07 | -392% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.25 | 16.03 | 750% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers