Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.57
Change-$0.17 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.81
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5B
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. NMSAX (2.5B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSAX (1.17) vs FSSNX (0.80). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. NMSAX (-5.58). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 30.95 vs. NMSAX (-9.49).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.053 | -3.794 | -370% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 2.5B | 1,172% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | -5.58 | -208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | 0.94 | 5,378% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.95 | -9.49 | -326% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.82 | 13.21 | 892% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers