Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.54
Change+$0.30 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.66B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.55
Change+$0.24 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.64B
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. NMSAX (2.64B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSAX (1.20) vs FSSNX (0.84). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.86 vs. NMSAX (-8.94). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 72.56 vs. NMSAX (23.82).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.332 | -0.529 | -1,952% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.7B | 2.64B | 1,050% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.20 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.86 | -8.94 | -133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.63 | 7.70 | 697% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.56 | 23.82 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.40 | 17.06 | 712% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement