Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.03
Change+$2.04 (+6.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$22.72
Change+$0.27 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. NMSAX (2.56B). FSSNX (1.03) and NMSAX (0.99) have matching dividends . FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. NMSAX (-0.07). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. NMSAX (-13.74).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.434 | 6.667 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 2.56B | 1,160% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.99 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | -0.07 | -25,831% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.32 | -6.10 | -644% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.49 | -13.74 | -185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.89 | 35.46 | 479% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers