Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.42
Change+$0.12 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.6B
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. NMSAX (2.6B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSAX (1.28) vs FSSNX (0.92). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. NMSAX (-13.08). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. NMSAX (15.50).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.204 | -5.514 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 2.6B | 983% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.28 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | -13.08 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | -7.96 | -395% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.96 | 15.50 | 393% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.15 | 1.68 | 4,882% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers