Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NMSAX
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NMSAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.60
Change+$0.60 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$23.21
Change+$0.33 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
FSSNX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NMSAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. NMSAX (2.56B). NMSAX pays higher dividends than FSSNX: NMSAX (1.17) vs FSSNX (0.80). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: FSSNX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.96 vs. NMSAX (-15.66). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. NMSAX (-1.26).
| FSSNX | NMSAX | FSSNX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.175 | 0.838 | 1,453% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 2.56B | 1,143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.96 | -15.66 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.77 | -6.83 | -538% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | -1.26 | -3,152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.61 | 16.62 | 635% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers