Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs NINAX
FSSNX vs NINAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs NINAX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.64
Change-$0.15 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value A
Price$21.57
Change-$0.14 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
FSSNX vs NINAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. NINAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and NINAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. NINAX (1.14B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than NINAX: FSSNX (0.90) vs NINAX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than NINAX: FSSNX (14 years) vs NINAX (15 years). NINAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). NINAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than NINAX: FSSNX (0) vs NINAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. NINAX (6.84). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 51.48 vs. NINAX (41.63).
| FSSNX | NINAX | FSSNX / NINAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.31 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.31 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.468 | 2.617 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 1.14B | 2,266% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 6.84 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.75 | 6.99 | 268% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.48 | 41.63 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.72 | 42.88 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement