Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZCOX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$33.03
Change+$2.04 (+6.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$10.67
Change+$0.81 (+8.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.81M
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZCOX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and LZCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. LZCOX (34.8M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FSSNX (1.03) vs LZCOX (0.38). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FSSNX (14 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: FSSNX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. LZCOX (-0.51). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. LZCOX (-23.95).
| FSSNX | LZCOX | FSSNX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.434 | 6.169 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 34.8M | 85,345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.38 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | -0.51 | -3,620% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.32 | -11.16 | -352% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.49 | -23.95 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.89 | -0.86 | -19,647% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers