Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZCOX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.79
Change-$0.18 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.42B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.04M
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZCOX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and LZCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. LZCOX (33M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FSSNX (0.82) vs LZCOX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FSSNX (14 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: FSSNX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.17 vs. LZCOX (-18.37). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.90 vs. LZCOX (-13.47).
| FSSNX | LZCOX | FSSNX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.236 | -5.486 | -205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 33M | 86,061% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.17 | -18.37 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.51 | -8.48 | -548% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.90 | -13.47 | -422% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.79 | -23.72 | -454% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement