Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZCOX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.60
Change+$0.60 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$10.22
Change+$0.20 (+2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.84M
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZCOX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and LZCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. LZCOX (33.8M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FSSNX (0.80) vs LZCOX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FSSNX (14 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: FSSNX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.96 vs. LZCOX (-19.89). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. LZCOX (-20.64).
| FSSNX | LZCOX | FSSNX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.175 | -3.080 | -395% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 33.8M | 86,686% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.96 | -19.89 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.77 | -13.78 | -267% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | -20.64 | -192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.61 | -24.42 | -433% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers