Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZCOX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.57
Change-$0.17 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$10.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.95M
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZCOX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and LZCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. LZCOX (34M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FSSNX (0.80) vs LZCOX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FSSNX (14 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: FSSNX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. LZCOX (-2.93). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 30.95 vs. LZCOX (-22.29).
| FSSNX | LZCOX | FSSNX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.053 | -1.059 | -1,327% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 34M | 86,176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | -2.93 | -396% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | -5.86 | -858% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.95 | -22.29 | -139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.82 | -16.73 | -704% |