Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LZCOX
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LZCOX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.52
Change-$0.22 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.27M
FSSNX vs LZCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LZCOX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and LZCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. LZCOX (33.3M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: FSSNX (0.90) vs LZCOX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LZCOX: FSSNX (14 years) vs LZCOX (29 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZCOX: FSSNX (0) vs LZCOX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.49 vs. LZCOX (-15.61). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 53.31 vs. LZCOX (-13.86).
| FSSNX | LZCOX | FSSNX / LZCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.20 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.829 | -7.892 | -49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 33.3M | 77,778% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.49 | -15.61 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.00 | -18.48 | -124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.31 | -13.86 | -385% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.64 | -27.07 | -353% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement