Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LMASX
FSSNX vs LMASX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LMASX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
ClearBridge Small Cap C
Price$35.09
Change+$0.18 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets719.26M
FSSNX vs LMASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LMASX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and LMASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. LMASX (719M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LMASX: FSSNX (0.92) vs LMASX (0.40). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LMASX: FSSNX (14 years) vs LMASX (40 years). LMASX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LMASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMASX: FSSNX (0) vs LMASX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. LMASX (-3.58). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 60.96 vs. LMASX (16.29).
| FSSNX | LMASX | FSSNX / LMASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.86 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.204 | 0.229 | 964% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 719M | 3,561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.40 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | -3.58 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 8.32 | 378% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.96 | 16.29 | 374% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.15 | 3.97 | 2,071% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers