Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs LMASX
FSSNX vs LMASX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs LMASX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.64
Change-$0.15 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
ClearBridge Small Cap C
Price$35.61
Change-$0.29 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets725.04M
FSSNX vs LMASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. LMASX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and LMASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. LMASX (725M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than LMASX: FSSNX (0.90) vs LMASX (0.38). FSSNX was incepted earlier than LMASX: FSSNX (14 years) vs LMASX (40 years). LMASX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). LMASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMASX: FSSNX (0) vs LMASX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. LMASX (0.61). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 51.48 vs. LMASX (10.91).
| FSSNX | LMASX | FSSNX / LMASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.86 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.468 | 1.714 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 725M | 3,572% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.38 | 235% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 0.61 | 1,441% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.75 | 0.18 | 10,262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.48 | 10.91 | 472% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.72 | 4.98 | 1,721% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement