Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs HOOCX
FSSNX vs HOOCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs HOOCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.60
Change+$0.60 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps C
Price$29.91
Change+$0.30 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets182.14M
FSSNX vs HOOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. HOOCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and HOOCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. HOOCX (182M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than HOOCX: FSSNX (0.80) vs HOOCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than HOOCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs HOOCX (9 years). HOOCX (2.16) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). HOOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HOOCX: FSSNX (0) vs HOOCX (2000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.96 vs. HOOCX (-8.40). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. HOOCX (9.53).
| FSSNX | HOOCX | FSSNX / HOOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.10 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.16 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.175 | 4.218 | 289% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 182M | 16,099% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.96 | -8.40 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.77 | 11.13 | 330% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | 9.53 | 416% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement