Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GSCZX
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GSCZX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$30.54
Change+$0.30 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.66B
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$18.24
Change+$0.18 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets906.75M
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GSCZX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and GSCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. GSCZX (907M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FSSNX (0.84) vs GSCZX (0.20). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FSSNX (14 years) vs GSCZX (24 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCZX: FSSNX (0) vs GSCZX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.86 vs. GSCZX (-0.01). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 72.56 vs. GSCZX (30.67).
| FSSNX | GSCZX | FSSNX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.332 | 3.284 | 315% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.7B | 907M | 3,054% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.20 | 427% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.86 | -0.01 | -80,904% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.63 | 24.85 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.56 | 30.67 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.40 | 18.55 | 654% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement