Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GSCZX
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GSCZX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.74
Change+$0.09 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.3B
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$17.20
Change+$0.07 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets861.24M
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GSCZX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and GSCZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.3B vs. GSCZX (861M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FSSNX (0.80) vs GSCZX (0.19). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FSSNX (14 years) vs GSCZX (24 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCZX: FSSNX (0) vs GSCZX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. GSCZX (-3.59). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 31.66 vs. GSCZX (-7.49).
| FSSNX | GSCZX | FSSNX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.668 | -2.605 | -563% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3B | 861M | 3,403% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.19 | 412% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | -3.59 | -369% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.13 | 14.61 | 343% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.66 | -7.49 | -423% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.25 | 12.66 | 950% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement