Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs GSCZX
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs GSCZX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$32.73
Change-$0.30 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.73B
GuideStone Funds Small Cap Equity I
Price$17.77
Change-$0.06 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets891.67M
FSSNX vs GSCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. GSCZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and GSCZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.7B vs. GSCZX (892M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than GSCZX: FSSNX (1.03) vs GSCZX (0.26). FSSNX was incepted earlier than GSCZX: FSSNX (14 years) vs GSCZX (24 years). GSCZX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). GSCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCZX: FSSNX (0) vs GSCZX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.62 vs. GSCZX (-1.32). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 25.49 vs. GSCZX (-11.24).
| FSSNX | GSCZX | FSSNX / GSCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.23 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.434 | 5.952 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 892M | 3,330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.26 | 397% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.62 | -1.32 | -1,412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.32 | 5.67 | 694% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.49 | -11.24 | -227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.89 | 37.67 | 451% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers