Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSAX vs WCMLX
FSSAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSAX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth Adv
Price$26.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
FSSAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.44B vs. WCMLX (43M). FSSAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSAX (25 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSSAX (0.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSAX (16.31). FSSAX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. FSSAX (1.14). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. FSSAX (-7.48).
| FSSAX | WCMLX | FSSAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.79 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.602 | 7.232 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 43M | 5,672% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.14 | 1.70 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.08 | 33.88 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.48 | 12.48 | -60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement