Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSAX vs WCMLX
FSSAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSAX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth Adv
Price$28.59
Change+$0.46 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
FSSAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.54B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). FSSAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSAX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSSAX (0.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSAX (16.31). FSSAX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.14 vs. FSSAX (-2.06). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. FSSAX (-10.52).
| FSSAX | WCMLX | FSSAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.79 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.645 | 7.621 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 44.4M | 5,716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.06 | -1.14 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.37 | 21.83 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.52 | 1.99 | -529% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement