Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRPX vs RYLCX
FSRPX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRPX vs RYLCX
Fidelity Select Retailing
Price$20.31
Change+$0.15 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
Rydex Leisure C
Price$73.00
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.77M
FSRPX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRPX vs. RYLCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRPX is a Buy and RYLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.56B vs. RYLCX (5.77M). RYLCX pays higher dividends than FSRPX: RYLCX (0.55) vs FSRPX (0.12). FSRPX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSRPX (40 years) vs RYLCX (25 years). RYLCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.64). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FSRPX (39.00). FSRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSRPX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRPX: RYLCX (1000) vs FSRPX (500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.20 vs. FSRPX (-8.40). RYLCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.97 vs. FSRPX (-13.69).
| FSRPX | RYLCX | FSRPX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.39 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.44 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.270 | 5.493 | -23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 5.77M | 44,385% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.55 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.40 | -0.20 | 4,132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.70 | 36.42 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.69 | 3.97 | -344% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.44 | 46.09 | 190% |