Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRPX vs RYLCX
FSRPX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRPX vs RYLCX
Fidelity Select Retailing
Price$18.91
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5B
Rydex Leisure C
Price$73.42
Change+$0.71 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.54M
FSRPX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRPX vs. RYLCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRPX is a Hold and RYLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.5B vs. RYLCX (5.54M). FSRPX pays higher dividends than RYLCX: FSRPX (0.15) vs RYLCX (0.08). FSRPX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSRPX (40 years) vs RYLCX (25 years). RYLCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.64). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FSRPX (39.00). FSRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSRPX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRPX: RYLCX (1000) vs FSRPX (500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.46 vs. FSRPX (-12.62). RYLCX return over 5 years is better than : -5.56 vs. FSRPX (-20.69).
| FSRPX | RYLCX | FSRPX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.39 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.44 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.301 | -2.534 | -209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 5.54M | 45,164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.08 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.62 | 2.46 | -514% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.12 | 27.27 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.69 | -5.56 | 372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.15 | 61.91 | 175% |