Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRPX vs RYLCX
FSRPX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSRPX vs RYLCX
Fidelity Select Retailing
Price$20.51
Change-$0.08 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.73B
Rydex Leisure C
Price$77.86
Change-$0.19 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.07M
FSRPX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRPX vs. RYLCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRPX is a Buy and RYLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.73B vs. RYLCX (12.1M). RYLCX pays higher dividends than FSRPX: RYLCX (0.51) vs FSRPX (0.12). FSRPX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSRPX (40 years) vs RYLCX (24 years). RYLCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.66). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FSRPX (39.00). FSRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSRPX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRPX: RYLCX (1000) vs FSRPX (500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.54 vs. FSRPX (6.07). RYLCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.76 vs. FSRPX (-2.63).
| FSRPX | RYLCX | FSRPX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.39 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.44 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.195 | 12.547 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 12.1M | 22,595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.51 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.07 | 25.54 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.89 | 56.98 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.63 | 26.76 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.78 | 58.88 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement