Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRPX vs RYLAX
FSRPX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSRPX vs RYLAX
Fidelity Select Retailing
Price$20.31
Change+$0.15 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
Rydex Leisure H
Price$85.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.77M
FSRPX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRPX vs. RYLAX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRPX is a Buy and RYLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRPX has more cash in the bank: 2.56B vs. RYLAX (5.77M). RYLAX pays higher dividends than FSRPX: RYLAX (0.47) vs FSRPX (0.12). FSRPX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FSRPX (40 years) vs RYLAX (28 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSRPX (0.64). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FSRPX (39.00). FSRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FSRPX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSRPX: RYLAX (1000) vs FSRPX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.72 vs. FSRPX (-8.36). RYLAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.56 vs. FSRPX (-13.44).
| FSRPX | RYLAX | FSRPX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.63 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.68 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.782 | 6.248 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 5.77M | 44,385% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.47 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.36 | 0.72 | -1,158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.29 | 39.54 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.44 | 7.56 | -178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.37 | 60.59 | 146% |