FSRL
Price
$10.00
Change
+$0.30 (+3.09%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
25.51M
94 days until earnings call
KTHAF
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.02 (-3.23%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
Capitalization
6.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSRL vs KTHAF

Header iconFSRL vs KTHAF Comparison
Open Charts FSRL vs KTHAFBanner chart's image
First Reliance Bancshares
Price$10.00
Change+$0.30 (+3.09%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization25.51M
Krung Thai Bank Public
Price$0.60
Change-$0.02 (-3.23%)
Volume$2.22K
Capitalization6.53B
FSRL vs KTHAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSRL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSRL vs. KTHAF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRL is a Buy and KTHAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FSRL: $10.00 vs. KTHAF: $0.60)
Brand notoriety: FSRL and KTHAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSRL: 112% vs. KTHAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FSRL: $25.51M vs. KTHAF: $6.53B
FSRL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.51M. KTHAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSRL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKTHAF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FSRL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KTHAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KTHAF is a better buy in the long-term than FSRL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSRL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSRL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FSRL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.17% price change this week, while KTHAF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSRL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KTHAF($6.53B) has a higher market cap than FSRL($25.5M). FSRL has higher P/E ratio than KTHAF: FSRL (11.85) vs KTHAF (6.98). FSRL YTD gains are higher at: 4.275 vs. KTHAF (0.000). FSRL has less debt than KTHAF: FSRL (35.3M) vs KTHAF (418B). KTHAF has higher revenues than FSRL: KTHAF (148B) vs FSRL (22.5M).
FSRLKTHAFFSRL / KTHAF
Capitalization25.5M6.53B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.2750.000-
P/E Ratio11.856.98170%
Revenue22.5M148B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt35.3M418B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSRL vs KTHAF: Fundamental Ratings
FSRL
KTHAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
413
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4246
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KTHAF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSRL (56). This means that KTHAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

KTHAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSRL (41). This means that KTHAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

KTHAF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRL (6). This means that KTHAF’s stock grew similarly to FSRL’s over the last 12 months.

FSRL's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as KTHAF (53). This means that FSRL’s stock grew similarly to KTHAF’s over the last 12 months.

FSRL's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as KTHAF (46). This means that FSRL’s stock grew similarly to KTHAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSRLKTHAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
40%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
29%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSRL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCRAA48.281.18
+2.51%
McRae Industries, Inc.
FCNCB1730.017.01
+0.41%
First Citizens BancShares, Inc.
FLMNF64.00N/A
N/A
Fielmann Group AG
FUJSF18.70N/A
N/A
Fuji Seal, Inc.
MRPT0.08N/A
N/A
MacReport.Net, Inc. (The)

FSRL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSRL and KTHAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSRL and KTHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSRL
1D Price
Change %
FSRL100%
+3.09%
KTHAF - FSRL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFB - FSRL
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.00%
EMYB - FSRL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOB - FSRL
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.30%
FHB - FSRL
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More

KTHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KTHAF has been loosely correlated with NUBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KTHAF jumps, then NUBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTHAF
1D Price
Change %
KTHAF100%
N/A
NUBC - KTHAF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
FSRL - KTHAF
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
ALBKF - KTHAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHG - KTHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
KSBI - KTHAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More