Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRFX vs RYCNX
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison
Open Charts FSRFX vs RYCNX
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$105.50
Change+$0.46 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.57M
FSRFX vs RYCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRFX vs. RYCNX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRFX is a Buy and RYCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSRFX has more cash in the bank: 479M vs. RYCNX (6.45M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than RYCNX: FSRFX (1.31) vs RYCNX (0.67). FSRFX was incepted earlier than RYCNX: FSRFX (39 years) vs RYCNX (24 years). RYCNX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.69). RYCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 207.00 vs. FSRFX (22.00). FSRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCNX: FSRFX (0) vs RYCNX (2500). RYCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.99 vs. FSRFX (-0.49). FSRFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.78 vs. RYCNX (11.16).
| FSRFX | RYCNX | FSRFX / RYCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.40 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.43 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.833 | -0.769 | -239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 479M | 6.45M | 7,428% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.67 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.49 | 4.99 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.96 | -0.53 | -3,943% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.78 | 11.16 | 482% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.74 | 4.96 | 720% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement