FSRCY
Price
$109.15
Change
+$10.09 (+10.19%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
WLMIF
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.18 (+8.29%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
19.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSRCY vs WLMIF

Header iconFSRCY vs WLMIF Comparison
Open Charts FSRCY vs WLMIFBanner chart's image
First Resources
Price$109.15
Change+$10.09 (+10.19%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.78B
Wilmar International
Price$2.35
Change+$0.18 (+8.29%)
Volume$1.41K
Capitalization19.51B
FSRCY vs WLMIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSRCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSRCY vs. WLMIF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRCY is a Hold and WLMIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FSRCY: $99.22 vs. WLMIF: $2.35)
Brand notoriety: FSRCY and WLMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSRCY: 100% vs. WLMIF: 3%
Market capitalization -- FSRCY: $1.78B vs. WLMIF: $19.51B
FSRCY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $1.78B. WLMIF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $19.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSRCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSRCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSRCY is a better buy in the long-term than WLMIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSRCY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSRCY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSRCY is a better buy in the short-term than WLMIF.

Price Growth

FSRCY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLMIF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +3.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($19.5B) has a higher market cap than FSRCY($1.78B). FSRCY has higher P/E ratio than WLMIF: FSRCY (19.31) vs WLMIF (8.61). WLMIF YTD gains are higher at: 6.818 vs. FSRCY (-4.886). WLMIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.01B vs. FSRCY (517M). WLMIF has more cash in the bank: 3.74B vs. FSRCY (434M). FSRCY has less debt than WLMIF: FSRCY (296M) vs WLMIF (32.3B). WLMIF has higher revenues than FSRCY: WLMIF (72.4B) vs FSRCY (1.23B).
FSRCYWLMIFFSRCY / WLMIF
Capitalization1.78B19.5B9%
EBITDA517M5.01B10%
Gain YTD-4.8866.818-72%
P/E Ratio19.318.61224%
Revenue1.23B72.4B2%
Total Cash434M3.74B12%
Total Debt296M32.3B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSRCY vs WLMIF: Fundamental Ratings
FSRCY
WLMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4684
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7377
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1617
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3035

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLMIF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRCY (19). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to FSRCY’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FSRCY (100). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to FSRCY’s over the last 12 months.

FSRCY's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLMIF (99). This means that FSRCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

FSRCY's Price Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (77). This means that FSRCY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

FSRCY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (17). This means that FSRCY’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSRCYWLMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSRCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEGRX17.860.10
+0.56%
Franklin Mutual Beacon Z
GGOCX22.210.12
+0.54%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth C
CDDYX35.420.09
+0.25%
Columbia Dividend Income Inst3
MFLDX24.58N/A
N/A
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
MSGGX12.61N/A
N/A
Meridian Small Cap Growth Legacy

FSRCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSRCY has been loosely correlated with RELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSRCY jumps, then RELV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSRCY
1D Price
Change %
FSRCY100%
N/A
RELV - FSRCY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BGS - FSRCY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
TATYF - FSRCY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSF - FSRCY
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
WLMIF - FSRCY
1%
Poorly correlated
+8.10%
More

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
+8.10%
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
+17.84%
ASBFY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
TUFBY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATPC - WLMIF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
WLMIY - WLMIF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More