Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRBX vs RPFGX
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FSRBX vs RPFGX
Fidelity Select Banking
Price$33.24
Change+$0.42 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets430.73M
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRBX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRBX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. FSRBX (431M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: FSRBX (2.16) vs RPFGX (1.35). FSRBX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FSRBX (39 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). RPFGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSRBX (0.71). FSRBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). FSRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FSRBX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.09 vs. FSRBX (28.23). FSRBX (129.99) and RPFGX (125.88) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSRBX | RPFGX | FSRBX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.030 | 16.116 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 431M | 1.14B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 1.35 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.23 | 31.09 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.57 | 68.82 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 129.99 | 125.88 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.94 | 98.24 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement