Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRBX vs RPFGX
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FSRBX vs RPFGX
Fidelity Select Banking
Price$37.48
Change+$0.16 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.83M
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRBX vs. RPFGX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRBX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. FSRBX (438M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: FSRBX (1.97) vs RPFGX (1.26). FSRBX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FSRBX (40 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). RPFGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSRBX (0.71). FSRBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). FSRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FSRBX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.89 vs. FSRBX (16.72). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 98.72 vs. FSRBX (88.55).
| FSRBX | RPFGX | FSRBX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.683 | 26.280 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 438M | 1.23B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.72 | 24.89 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.79 | 77.10 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.55 | 98.72 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.21 | 124.67 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers