Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSRBX vs RPFGX
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FSRBX vs RPFGX
Fidelity Select Banking
Price$34.17
Change+$0.11 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets427.89M
FSRBX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSRBX vs. RPFGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSRBX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. FSRBX (428M). FSRBX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: FSRBX (2.04) vs RPFGX (1.30). FSRBX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FSRBX (39 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). RPFGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSRBX (0.71). FSRBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). FSRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFGX: FSRBX (0) vs RPFGX (1000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.55 vs. FSRBX (0.56). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 97.57 vs. FSRBX (91.48).
| FSRBX | RPFGX | FSRBX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.94 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.671 | 22.913 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 428M | 1.17B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 1.30 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.56 | 16.55 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.54 | 63.56 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.48 | 97.57 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.66 | 116.01 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement