Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPTX vs RCGTX
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts FSPTX vs RCGTX
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$42.16
Change+$0.11 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.99B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$14.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.69B
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPTX is a Buy and RCGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. RCGTX (1.69B). FSPTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: FSPTX (44 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RCGTX (2.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: FSPTX (0) vs RCGTX (2500). FSPTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.85 vs. RCGTX (0.77). FSPTX return over 5 years is better than : 57.34 vs. RCGTX (-66.91).
| FSPTX | RCGTX | FSPTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.018 | 5.037 | 278% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 1.69B | 1,656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.85 | 0.77 | 1,279% |
| Returns for 3 years | 138.95 | 135.13 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.34 | -66.91 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 250.22 | -65.88 | -380% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement