Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPTX vs RCGTX
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts FSPTX vs RCGTX
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$41.24
Change-$3.67 (-8.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.43B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$13.83
Change-$3.41 (-19.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPTX is a Hold and RCGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. RCGTX (1.66B). FSPTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: FSPTX (45 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RCGTX (2.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: FSPTX (0) vs RCGTX (2500). FSPTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.62 vs. RCGTX (-0.79). FSPTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.14 vs. RCGTX (-69.96).
| FSPTX | RCGTX | FSPTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.269 | -2.399 | -95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 1.66B | 1,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.62 | -0.79 | -2,487% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.93 | 87.14 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.14 | -69.96 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 315.17 | -62.17 | -507% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement