Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPTX vs RCGTX
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts FSPTX vs RCGTX
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$41.69
Change-$1.04 (-2.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.85B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$16.80
Change-$0.51 (-2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPTX is a Hold and RCGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 20.8B vs. RCGTX (1.72B). FSPTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: FSPTX (44 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RCGTX (2.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: FSPTX (0) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.71 vs. FSPTX (11.86). FSPTX return over 5 years is better than : 52.63 vs. RCGTX (-66.42).
| FSPTX | RCGTX | FSPTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.862 | 26.350 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.8B | 1.72B | 1,209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.86 | 25.71 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 124.45 | 13.66 | 911% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.63 | -66.42 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 257.19 | -64.61 | -398% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement