Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPTX vs RCGTX
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts FSPTX vs RCGTX
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$44.24
Change+$0.46 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.55B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$17.23
Change+$0.27 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.72B
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPTX is a Hold and RCGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 19.6B vs. RCGTX (1.72B). FSPTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: FSPTX (44 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RCGTX (2.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: FSPTX (0) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.46 vs. FSPTX (18.48). FSPTX return over 5 years is better than : 55.60 vs. RCGTX (-68.37).
| FSPTX | RCGTX | FSPTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.709 | 23.796 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6B | 1.72B | 1,142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.48 | 30.46 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 147.52 | 15.93 | 926% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.60 | -68.37 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 271.68 | -64.49 | -421% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement