Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPTX vs RCGTX
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison
Open Charts FSPTX vs RCGTX
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$40.76
Change+$0.21 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.18B
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$15.76
Change+$0.06 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
FSPTX vs RCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPTX vs. RCGTX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPTX is a Hold and RCGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 18.2B vs. RCGTX (1.6B). FSPTX (0.00) and RCGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSPTX was incepted earlier than RCGTX: FSPTX (44 years) vs RCGTX (24 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RCGTX (23.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: FSPTX (0) vs RCGTX (2500). RCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.61 vs. FSPTX (14.42). FSPTX return over 5 years is better than : 57.80 vs. RCGTX (-67.42).
| FSPTX | RCGTX | FSPTX / RCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.17 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.951 | 15.036 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.2B | 1.6B | 1,138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.42 | 27.61 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.67 | -10.30 | -851% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.80 | -67.42 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 269.64 | -65.51 | -412% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement