Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SWHFX
FSPHX vs SWHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SWHFX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and SWHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. SWHFX (680M). SWHFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: SWHFX (0.61) vs FSPHX (0.01). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SWHFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs SWHFX (25 years). SWHFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). SWHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and SWHFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.10 vs. FSPHX (-2.08). SWHFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.05 vs. FSPHX (-9.00).
| FSPHX | SWHFX | FSPHX / SWHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.028 | 15.971 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 680M | 981% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.61 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.08 | 0.10 | -2,147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.82 | -2.16 | -362% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.00 | -3.05 | 296% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.40 | 3.93 | 1,027% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers