Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs SBHIX
FSPHX vs SBHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. SBHIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and SBHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. SBHIX (11.1M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than SBHIX: FSPHX (0.43) vs SBHIX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than SBHIX: FSPHX (45 years) vs SBHIX (23 years). SBHIX (2.60) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. SBHIX (22.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHIX: FSPHX (0) vs SBHIX (250). SBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.91 vs. FSPHX (0.29). SBHIX return over 5 years is better than : 19.39 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| FSPHX | SBHIX | FSPHX / SBHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.60 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.60 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | 1.702 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 11.1M | 56,559% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 9.91 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | 14.75 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | 19.39 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | -3.88 | -1,616% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement