Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHAX
FSPHX vs RYHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RYHAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. RYHAX (20.7M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHAX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYHAX (28 years). RYHAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 236.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHAX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHAX (2500). RYHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.58 vs. FSPHX (-5.87). RYHAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.31 vs. FSPHX (-12.12).
| FSPHX | RYHAX | FSPHX / RYHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.69 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.761 | 13.291 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 20.7M | 30,029% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.87 | 6.58 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.94 | 18.77 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.12 | 10.31 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.27 | 31.09 | 133% |