Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYHAX
FSPHX vs RYHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYHAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.36B vs. RYHAX (21.4M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYHAX: FSPHX (0.43) vs RYHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYHAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs RYHAX (28 years). RYHAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 236.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYHAX: FSPHX (0) vs RYHAX (2500). RYHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. FSPHX (4.21). RYHAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.88 vs. FSPHX (-12.92).
| FSPHX | RYHAX | FSPHX / RYHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.64 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.69 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.774 | 2.869 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 21.4M | 29,715% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 12.33 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.83 | 19.55 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.92 | 14.88 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.06 | 52.45 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement