Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYCFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RYCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. RYCFX (104M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RYCFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RYCFX (25 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FSPHX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). RYCFX (-3.91) and FSPHX (-3.95) have marching annual gain over last year. FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -11.15 vs. RYCFX (-31.44).
| FSPHX | RYCFX | FSPHX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.972 | 26.594 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 104M | 5,977% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.95 | -3.91 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.32 | 2.84 | 398% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.15 | -31.44 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.88 | -31.33 | -134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement