Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RYCFX
FSPHX vs RYCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RYCFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RYCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.36B vs. RYCFX (135M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RYCFX: FSPHX (0.43) vs RYCFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RYCFX: FSPHX (45 years) vs RYCFX (25 years). RYCFX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). RYCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCFX: FSPHX (0) vs RYCFX (2500). RYCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.93 vs. FSPHX (4.21). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -12.92 vs. RYCFX (-42.80).
| FSPHX | RYCFX | FSPHX / RYCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.38 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.43 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.774 | 2.784 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 135M | 4,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 9.93 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.83 | -9.54 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.92 | -42.80 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.06 | -29.82 | -181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers