Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RCGHX
FSPHX vs RCGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RCGHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and RCGHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. RCGHX (103M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RCGHX: FSPHX (0.02) vs RCGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RCGHX: FSPHX (44 years) vs RCGHX (24 years). RCGHX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RCGHX (8.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RCGHX (2500). RCGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.88 vs. FSPHX (-5.87). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -12.12 vs. RCGHX (-39.12).
| FSPHX | RCGHX | FSPHX / RCGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.14 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.14 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.761 | 5.276 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 103M | 6,035% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.87 | -0.88 | 669% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.94 | -9.88 | -90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.12 | -39.12 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.27 | -43.26 | -95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement