Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs RAGHX
FSPHX vs RAGHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. RAGHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and RAGHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. RAGHX (97.8M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than RAGHX: FSPHX (0.43) vs RAGHX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than RAGHX: FSPHX (45 years) vs RAGHX (24 years). RAGHX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RAGHX (8.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAGHX: FSPHX (0) vs RAGHX (2500). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. RAGHX (-2.56). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.13 vs. RAGHX (-17.76).
| FSPHX | RAGHX | FSPHX / RAGHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.40 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.40 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | -3.842 | -21% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 97.8M | 6,419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | -2.56 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | -1.18 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | -17.76 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | 13.59 | 461% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement