Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PHSZX
FSPHX vs PHSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHSZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PHSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. PHSZX (1.47B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PHSZX: FSPHX (0.43) vs PHSZX (0.25). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHSZX: FSPHX (45 years) vs PHSZX (27 years). PHSZX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). PHSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and PHSZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PHSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.41 vs. FSPHX (0.29). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.13 vs. PHSZX (-22.40).
| FSPHX | PHSZX | FSPHX / PHSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.86 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | -1.066 | -76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 1.47B | 427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.25 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 2.41 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | 12.98 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | -22.40 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | 26.45 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement