Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PHLCX
FSPHX vs PHLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PHLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. PHLCX (1.46B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PHLCX: FSPHX (0.43) vs PHLCX (0.17). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs PHLCX (27 years). PHLCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). PHLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLCX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. PHLCX (-25.85). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.13 vs. PHLCX (-70.74).
| FSPHX | PHLCX | FSPHX / PHLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | -1.126 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 1.46B | 431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.17 | 255% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | -25.85 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | -40.59 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | -70.74 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | -63.88 | -98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement