Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PHLCX
FSPHX vs PHLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLCX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and PHLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. PHLCX (1.5B). PHLCX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: PHLCX (1.19) vs FSPHX (0.01). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PHLCX (27 years). PHLCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). PHLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLCX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.06 vs. PHLCX (-22.27). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -2.91 vs. PHLCX (-68.96).
| FSPHX | PHLCX | FSPHX / PHLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.96 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.211 | -20.783 | -64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 1.5B | 444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 1.19 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.06 | -22.27 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.41 | -39.15 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.91 | -68.96 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.73 | -71.25 | -68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement