Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PHLAX
FSPHX vs PHLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and PHLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. PHLAX (1.51B). PHLAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: PHLAX (0.65) vs FSPHX (0.01). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PHLAX (27 years). PHLAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). PHLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLAX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLAX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.50 vs. PHLAX (3.96). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -2.50 vs. PHLAX (-28.12).
| FSPHX | PHLAX | FSPHX / PHLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.13 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.13 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.688 | 5.860 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 1.51B | 443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.65 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.50 | 3.96 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.88 | 7.22 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.50 | -28.12 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.35 | -17.53 | -282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement