Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PHLAX
FSPHX vs PHLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PHLAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PHLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. PHLAX (1.46B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PHLAX: FSPHX (0.43) vs PHLAX (0.11). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PHLAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs PHLAX (27 years). PHLAX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). PHLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PHLAX: FSPHX (0) vs PHLAX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. PHLAX (-0.96). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.13 vs. PHLAX (-32.31).
| FSPHX | PHLAX | FSPHX / PHLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.13 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.13 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | -1.100 | -74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 1.46B | 430% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.11 | 374% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | -0.96 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | 4.53 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | -32.31 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | 3.52 | 1,779% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement