Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PDFDX
FSPHX vs PDFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PDFDX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and PDFDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. PDFDX (6.71M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PDFDX: FSPHX (0.02) vs PDFDX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PDFDX: FSPHX (44 years) vs PDFDX (28 years). PDFDX (4.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. PDFDX (10.08). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDFDX: FSPHX (0) vs PDFDX (2500). PDFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. FSPHX (-9.25). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.08 vs. PDFDX (-17.42).
| FSPHX | PDFDX | FSPHX / PDFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.69 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.358 | -0.038 | -13,927% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 6.71M | 88,869% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.25 | 10.55 | -88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.28 | 31.17 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.08 | -17.42 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.84 | 63.02 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement