Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs PDFDX
FSPHX vs PDFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. PDFDX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and PDFDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.36B vs. PDFDX (7.17M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than PDFDX: FSPHX (0.43) vs PDFDX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than PDFDX: FSPHX (45 years) vs PDFDX (28 years). PDFDX (4.69) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. PDFDX (10.08). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PDFDX: FSPHX (0) vs PDFDX (2500). PDFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.53 vs. FSPHX (4.21). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -12.92 vs. PDFDX (-38.46).
| FSPHX | PDFDX | FSPHX / PDFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.69 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.774 | 4.484 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 7.17M | 88,726% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 10.53 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.83 | 33.12 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.92 | -38.46 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.06 | 103.55 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement