Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCVX
FSPHX vs LHCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCVX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and LHCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. LHCVX (8.99M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCVX: FSPHX (0.01) vs LHCVX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCVX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCVX (6 years). LHCVX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.31 vs. FSPHX (-1.95). LHCVX return over 5 years is better than : 26.75 vs. FSPHX (-7.43).
| FSPHX | LHCVX | FSPHX / LHCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.68 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.394 | 20.690 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 8.99M | 74,219% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.95 | 12.31 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.17 | 30.54 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.43 | 26.75 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement