Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCTX
FSPHX vs LHCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCTX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. LHCTX (8.77M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCTX: FSPHX (0.43) vs LHCTX (0.38). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCTX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCTX (7 years). LHCTX (3.09) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.56 vs. FSPHX (0.29). LHCTX return over 5 years is better than : 6.91 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| FSPHX | LHCTX | FSPHX / LHCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.78 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.09 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | -1.099 | -74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 8.77M | 71,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.38 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 11.56 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | 28.33 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | 6.91 | -190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement