Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCTX
FSPHX vs LHCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCTX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. LHCTX (9.04M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCTX: FSPHX (0.01) vs LHCTX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCTX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCTX (6 years). LHCTX (3.09) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.75 vs. FSPHX (11.48). LHCTX return over 5 years is better than : 16.38 vs. FSPHX (-2.50).
| FSPHX | LHCTX | FSPHX / LHCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.78 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.09 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.688 | 19.286 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 9.04M | 73,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 16.75 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.67 | 34.23 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.50 | 16.38 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement