Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCSX
FSPHX vs LHCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.36B vs. LHCSX (8.87M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCSX: FSPHX (0.43) vs LHCSX (0.16). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCSX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCSX (6 years). LHCSX (3.34) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.31 vs. FSPHX (3.52). LHCSX return over 5 years is better than : 8.83 vs. FSPHX (-12.80).
| FSPHX | LHCSX | FSPHX / LHCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.03 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.34 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.161 | -0.178 | -653% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 8.87M | 71,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.16 | 266% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.52 | 16.31 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.22 | 28.22 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.80 | 8.83 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement