Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCSX
FSPHX vs LHCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCSX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. LHCSX (9.01M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCSX: FSPHX (0.01) vs LHCSX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCSX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCSX (6 years). LHCSX (3.34) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.27 vs. FSPHX (-0.15). LHCSX return over 5 years is better than : 19.75 vs. FSPHX (-9.31).
| FSPHX | LHCSX | FSPHX / LHCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.03 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.34 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.550 | 18.956 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 9.01M | 74,062% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.15 | 12.27 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.78 | 29.97 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.31 | 19.75 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers