Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCOX
FSPHX vs LHCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCOX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. LHCOX (9.01M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCOX: FSPHX (0.01) vs LHCOX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCOX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCOX (6 years). LHCOX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.89 vs. FSPHX (3.63). LHCOX return over 5 years is better than : 16.99 vs. FSPHX (-9.36).
| FSPHX | LHCOX | FSPHX / LHCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.68 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.688 | 19.361 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 9.01M | 74,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.63 | 16.89 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.67 | 34.86 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.36 | 16.99 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement