Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCOX
FSPHX vs LHCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCOX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. LHCOX (8.68M). LHCOX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCOX (0.50) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCOX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCOX (6 years). LHCOX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. FSPHX (-3.95). LHCOX return over 5 years is better than : 5.99 vs. FSPHX (-11.15).
| FSPHX | LHCOX | FSPHX / LHCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.68 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.972 | 14.006 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 8.68M | 71,588% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.50 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.95 | 6.70 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.32 | 29.94 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.15 | 5.99 | -186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement