Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCOX
FSPHX vs LHCOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCOX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. LHCOX (8.77M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCOX: FSPHX (0.43) vs LHCOX (0.37). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCOX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCOX (7 years). LHCOX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX (0) and LHCOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LHCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. FSPHX (0.29). LHCOX return over 5 years is better than : 7.52 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| FSPHX | LHCOX | FSPHX / LHCOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.68 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | -1.050 | -77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 8.77M | 71,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.37 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 11.71 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | 28.93 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | 7.52 | -174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | N/A | - |