Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCIX
FSPHX vs LHCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. LHCIX (8.68M). LHCIX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: LHCIX (0.51) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCIX (6 years). LHCIX (3.09) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCIX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCIX (1000000). LHCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.89 vs. FSPHX (-3.95). LHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 6.76 vs. FSPHX (-11.15).
| FSPHX | LHCIX | FSPHX / LHCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.78 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.09 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.972 | 15.194 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 8.68M | 71,588% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.51 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.95 | 7.89 | -50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.32 | 30.52 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.15 | 6.76 | -165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers