Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCIX
FSPHX vs LHCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCIX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.36B vs. LHCIX (8.87M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCIX: FSPHX (0.43) vs LHCIX (0.36). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCIX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCIX (6 years). LHCIX (3.09) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCIX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCIX (1000000). LHCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.82 vs. FSPHX (4.21). LHCIX return over 5 years is better than : 11.24 vs. FSPHX (-12.92).
| FSPHX | LHCIX | FSPHX / LHCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.78 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.09 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.774 | 1.011 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 8.87M | 71,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.36 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 19.82 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.83 | 30.47 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.92 | 11.24 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers