Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCCX
FSPHX vs LHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and LHCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. LHCCX (8.77M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCCX: FSPHX (0.43) vs LHCCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs LHCCX (7 years). LHCCX (4.09) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCCX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCCX (1500). LHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.86 vs. FSPHX (0.29). LHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.07 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| FSPHX | LHCCX | FSPHX / LHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.78 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 4.09 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | -1.117 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 8.77M | 71,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 10.86 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | 25.01 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | 2.07 | -635% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement