Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs LHCAX
FSPHX vs LHCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. LHCAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and LHCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. LHCAX (9.01M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than LHCAX: FSPHX (0.01) vs LHCAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than LHCAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs LHCAX (6 years). LHCAX (3.34) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). LHCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LHCAX: FSPHX (0) vs LHCAX (1500). LHCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.71 vs. FSPHX (11.48). LHCAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.29 vs. FSPHX (-2.50).
| FSPHX | LHCAX | FSPHX / LHCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.03 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 3.34 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.688 | 19.207 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 9.01M | 74,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 16.71 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.67 | 33.50 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.50 | 15.29 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement